{:fr}A propos de MedCamer{:}{:en}About MedCamer{:}
{:fr}

{:}{:en}There are a lot of ideas about what MedCamer can or can do as an organization. We can be a lot of things both big and ambitious. What can federated intelligences accomplish with the idea of improving their profession and their daily life, with the intention of taking the steps of progress, in the direction of bringing a collective of individuals united by the same trade to the honorable position Their profession. However, this demands a constant effort of almost justifying our lines of ideological commitment, legal non-trade unionist and apolitical so much the need towards the latter is pressing and the desire to gather under an active and activist banner is important.
Our consistency in the initial vision remains a guarantee of our professionalism and our credibility as an organization even if at times it seems incomprehensible and disappointing for some in our context. This is precisely the place to be more strongly faithful to this identity. In the end, the intellectual work of cultural revolution remains a daily fact. The birth of a union of doctors tends to temper this expectation of our organization, which continues to consolidate itself as a melting pot of a thinking of progress by changing behavior. A work of every moment.
Each convinced MedCamerian should understand, live, defend and spread this vision and our coherence. We must maintain our ambition, which can not be anything but great. We must persist in building it on an almost forgotten basic educational model, centered on collective thought and constructive action, and better still on the participative engagement of individuals aware of their potential, capacity and role Expected in an institutional mechanism that self-fuel thanks to the voluntary energy of its members. But it is clear that any presence within a group is not a proof of adherence.
The convincing and convincing nature of such an adhesion amounts to being perpetually defined or even hammered in our context, leaning on the opportunism and vacant of collective and disinterested ideologies. This model is alas for us profoundly demonstrative to convince. Its success over time depends on the actual materialization of a continuous action which leads to the readable individual and collective change.
Edouard Betsem{:}